Brahmans: Hindrances for Preaching the Gospel in Nepal


Brahmans: Hindrances for Preaching the Gospel in Nepal
-Shin, SungIm (Eunice Bhandari)
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Gospel and Brahmans in Nepal
Kingdom of Nepal locates between in India and in China and the government is constitutional monarchy system. Around the 90% of Nepalese  have Hindu religion.[1] Officially government announces freedom of religion but they can not evangelize other people. It is prohibited by law. In spite of these situations, Gospel entered long time ago. However there are not any evidences to find entering Gospel in Nepal before 1600s. In 1715 Mission organization is founded firstly in Nepal and after 50 years, Malla Dynasty welcomed entering Gospel.[2] “However they soon incurred the jealousy of the Brahmins who began to stir up public sentiment against them because of following a series of charges and suspected of spying for a foreign power.”[3] Finally Shah Dynasty closed about Gospel and expelled Christians in 1769. There are several reasons to reject Christianity. Largely it can be divided 3 reasons: political, religious reasons and Brahman’s rejection. Politically, they are afraid of entering many foreigners and their people believe foreign religion so they thought that they have to keep their country’s independence. Religiously, Nepal is Hindu religion and they do not want to contaminate their religion and want to maintain purely. Third reason is that because of Brahman’s resistances.[4] Vannini explained about Brahmans like that
“The real trouble- makers were the Brahmins, the people of high-caste, who, more than anyone else, realized the potential danger the Christian faith would pose to their religious establishments, should they allow it to grow, they were the ones who urged, through intimidation and threat, the relatives of the new converts either to reclaim them or to ostracize them from their society.”[5]
It shows that Brahmans are one of big hindrances of entering Gospel in Nepal. Therefore this paper will show who Brahman are, their position and influences and their attitude toward other caste and religions especially Christianity. This paper will the more focus on Brahman’s rejection to Gospel from first time to present historically and the reasons and the result in present Nepal church in Hindu society.

CHAPTER 2
BRAHMANS IN HINDUISM
Brahman’s position in Hindu society
Nepal’s Hinduism is a little different from other country’s Hinduism because Nepal’s Hinduism includes Buddhism and religious elements of Mongoloid origin are also incorporated in it.[6] “Hinduism is the state religion of Nepal and approximately 87% of the population professes Hinduism.”[7] In Hinduism, There are many gods. People think that god and man have same status that man is not a sinner but almost like a god. One unified reality becomes their basic of philosophy and religion.[8] About sin they do not believe the original of sin and they think that they can have salvation through the way of work, knowledge and devotion.[9] In this Hindu society, Brahman’s status is really high. They believe that “The Brahma is not only the moving power of the physical organs of man, but also the source of power and energy activating the whole universe.[10] Upanishads, the composition of the texts, teaches that the central concept and the holy power of the whole reality are Brahman and regard of as a personal Lord.[11] Like this, Brahmans are regard of human gods in this Hindu society in Nepal.

Practices of Brahmans
Religiously Brahman’s occupation is priest. As priest, they spent a lot time in the temples to worship and celebrate religious events. That is how they affect much influence to people.[12] In ancient times, priest’s status was very preeminent. They have many wisdom and knowledge, they used to study and teach Vedas to people. They play significant roles of mastery over the mighty.[13] As advisor, they advise people all kinds of matters of spiritual or temporal problems.[14] Attending worship service is many merits for Brahmans to control emphasizing the people’s faithfulness and urging to giving offerings.[15] During the service, Brahmans preside all the service programs and lead even in sacrificial animal ritual.[16]

CHAPTER 3
BRAHMANS IN SOCIETY
Brahman’s position in caste system
The basic condition to become a member of Hinduism is to acknowledge Brahman’s rank and caste system. Mark Johnson defined in his journal
“Caste system is a form of hierarchical stratification in which the necessary statements and judgments about relative status are couched predominantly in a traditional ritual language.”[17]
It is connected deeply with social and individual life style and it is a significant factor in Hindu society. It is needed to keep stronger the Hindu society and confirm higher the position of Brahman.
Caste determines an individual's behavior, obligations, and expectations. All the social, economic, religious, legal, and political activities of a caste society are prescribed by sanctions that determine and limit access to land, position of political power, and command of human labor.”[18]
Caste system can be divided four groups largely: first class is Brahman, second class is Chetris, third is vaisya and the last class is Sudra.[19] Brahmans is the highest class among other classes. “Chetris are king, politicians, soldiers etc and reign country and protect Brahman. They can lead service. Vaisya is merchants, farmer and artist and they can not lead the service. Sudra is servants of upper class and they can not attend all service.”[20] Sudra is the bottom of the hierarchy and they are regard of pollution and not pure.[21] “Brahman has had the dominant role in the modern kingdom of Nepal in the political realm and in the all-pervading social and religious realms.”[22] Like this, Brahman has a high position in the hierarchy and they enjoy many privileges.[23] This following statement show that How they are regarded of importantly.
“People should protect the Brahmans by performing four duties-by (showing him) respect and liberality, acknowledging his invincibility and by granting him security against capital punishment.”[24]

Their attitude toward other castes
Brahman’s attitude to other castes is showed through their culture and customs of life and social structure. Because of hierarchy social system, they are an upper class and have many privileges and powers. These kinds of privileges make them more superior themselves and arrogant and they are really trying keeping the high rank and advantages. These following examples prove this saying. “Each cast is strictly endogamous and inter-caste marriage is not tolerated.”[25] Brahmans marry only to Brahmans and they avoid marrying to lower castes which means they want to preserve the purity of blood.[26] Geologically most Brahmans live together with same class and do not live with lower castes. “More than half of all Brahmans and Chetris live in the western hills, where they form about eighty percent of that area’s total population.”[27] Their life style also shows that they do not eat meal together with other low caste and do not use a same table with them and also they do not have touch to them.[28] The other character is that Brahmans have many forbidden food especially meat comparing lower class. “The Newars, most of the lower castes, are great consumers of Buffaloes, and of goats, sheep, ducks and fowls.”[29] However Brahmans do not have such meat. The reason why they do not eat meat is that pure people Brahmans can not eat unclean food. Brahmans want to characterize in distinguish and separation with other class.

CHAPTER 4

BRAHMANS AND OTHER RELIGIONS

“In 1991, approximately 89.5 percent of the Nepalese people identified themselves as Hindus. Buddhists and Muslims comprised only 5.3 and 2.7 percent, respectively. The remainder followed other religions, including Christianity.”[30] These religions synthesis an integral social life and culture and intermingle with Buddhism.[31] Because of this religion dualism, there is not religion conflict and they exist with harmony.[32]
Hinduism: As the statistics show that around 90% of Nepal population have Hindu religion and most of them are Brahmans. It means that they are holding Hinduism and supporting Hinduism. Because already Hinduism is mentioned before in this paper, this time it will not mention about Hinduism any more here.
“Buddhism had its origin in the teachings of Siddhartha Gautama, a Kshatriya caste prince of the Sakya clan. The Buddha accepted or reinterpreted the basic concepts of Hinduism, such as karma, samsara, dharma, and moksha.”[33] Buddhism in Hindu society emphasizes pessimism and renunciation. Nirvana is similar in Moksha (salvation) in Hindu and metaphysical religion.[34] People worship Both Hindu and Buddha’s deities, Brahman and Buddhist
Priesthood work together and two religions are co-existing and
interacting freely.[35]
Muslim: In the late 15th and early 16th centuries first Muslims, kashmiri traders came to Nepal. They believe in one god and in Mohammed his prophet. Most of Nepal Muslims are the Sunni beliefs between Shia and Sunni. Like other countries Muslims, they pray and fast and gather the mosques to service. However they are not different from other Nepalis inhabitation and life style. They are regarded as someone who has different religion and because they do not evangelize other people, they and other Nepalis do not have a conflict.[36]
Tantrism is a combined religion with Hindu’s Vedas and Upanishads and Buddhism’s doctrines and ritual. In 6 centuries Tantirm developed Tantirc Hinduism and Buddhism. After that this Tantrism is united to Hindu and Buddha’s temple.[37]
Brahman’s attitude of other religions, Buddhism, Muslim, Tantrism is not negative. It is that because most Brahman are holding Hinduism and other religions are all connected and mixed with Hinduism. Their doctrines and teachings do not conflict with Hinduism and they do not evangelism also. The Hinduism acknowledges and supports Brahman’s status and as priest’s role. There are no problems to keep Brahman their own position with other religions.

Brahmans and Christianity
Historical process of Christianity’s persecution
However it is a different story to Christianity. Brahman’s attitude to Christianity is different from other religions. Unlike other religion, Christianity is struggling from first time entering Gospel to Nepal and until to present. As this paper shows in introduction part that Brahman’s objection against the Christianity is one of the reasons of hindrances of entering Gospel. In 19c most listeners and acceptors of Gospel are workers, traders and low caste not Brahmans. And baptism was showed strange and was refused by many people. In 1914 Shadu Sunder Singh went to Nepal through Darjeeling to preach Gospel but he was arrested and persecuted.[38] Since 1950-1951’s revolution, to live in Nepal as Christian and to accept foreigners are allowed.[39] However Nepal national constitution prohibits evangelism like that.
“The followers of Christianity, Islam and other religions should not preach or proselytize Hindus disturbing Hinduism. If someone has preached, he should be imprisoned for six years and if a foreigner is found guilty of preaching he should be expelled from the country. If any Hindu changes his religion to any of the above mentioned religions, she should be imprisoned for one year. If he has changed his religion he should return to Hinduism again.”[40]

Not only by law but also Brahmans persecute Christian and destroy church even in present time.[41] As Brahmans are high social rank, most prime ministers, politicians and layers must be Brahmans. They have decision right and they use it for their benefit. It means all Nepal’s history is reflected in Brahman’s power and has handled for Brahman’s advantages. They resist to remove something threaten their vested right.

The reasons of Brahman’s rejection to Christianity
Among Nepal Christian’s population, most of them are low caste. There are not many Brahmans.[42] It must be a reason not accept Christianity especially Brahmans comparing other caste.
First reason is that Bible teachings are different from Hindu’s teachings. Bible teaches only one God and do not acknowledge other gods and salvation can be have accepting Jesus not other ways. About caste system, Bible teaches that human right is all same and there is not like caste concept in Bible.[43] If caste system disappears due to Bible teaching, Brahmans will loose their privilege as high class. So they are afraid of spreading gospel and try to prevent Christianity. As most Brahmans are Hindu priest, they can not accept and can not stand different teaching from Hinduism.
Second Brahmans do not want to lose their privileges and vested rights. Jonathan Lindell expressed about this in his book like that.
“overall the Brahmins keep watch on the populace to see that they keep the caste rules and then serve people in the priestly functions and out casting someone who became Christina from before Hindu depended on the zeal of the society and the pressure of the Brahmins.”[44]
As this study shows that Brahmans have many advantages of politically, economically, religiously and socially. Comparing other religions, they are regarded highly and have enjoyed their blessings especially in Hindu society and caste system. These two systems allow Brahman’s position to protect and to preserve. The blessings are not small and loosing these benefits means for them to lose everything. It is natural to want to keep and hold these advantages forever. They think that Christianity is the one which takes away their rights and power because of its teaching. That is why they reject to spread Gospel.
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSION
Nepal history can not think without Hinduism, caste system and Brahman’s roles. These three factors also affect Christianity history in Nepal. Entering and preaching Gospel in this unique Nepal society is not easy. There are many obstacles. Especially Brahman’s resistance is a big hindrance. The statue and position of the Brahmans in Hindu society and caste system is really different from other democratic countries. These two systems make Brahmans to regard highly and give to maintain the rights as religious Hindu priest, social leader, economical the rich, ethical purist etc. With all these special privileges, they have handled Nepal Christianity history. Unlike other low caste people, the Brahman numbers of becoming Christians are a few.[45] It is a good evidence Brahmans’ resistance to Christianity. Their proud and arrogant and a desire to maintain the benefits make reject listening and spreading Gospel. The Brahman’s attitude and behaviors are surely one of hindrances preventing Gospel in Nepal history.


BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bista, Dor Bahadur. People of Nepal. Bhotahity, Kathmandu: Ratna Pustak Bhandar, 1996.

Emery, G. w. and M.W. Anderson. Things Touching the King. London: Marshall, Morgan and Scott, 1952.

Johnson, Mark. The Quandary of Caste Voice of Bhakti: Text in Context, Number 4: November 2002.

Lee, Chun Shim. “A Proposed Mission Strategy of the Korean Church for Nepal (M.A. thesis, ACTS, Seoul), 24; quoted in Introducing Nepal.

Lindell, Jonathan. Nepal and the Gospel of God. Kathmandu, Nepal: The United Mission to Nepal and Pilgrims Book House, 1997.

Maharjan,Mangal Man. Comparative Study of Hinduism and Christianity in Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: Ekta Books, 2002.

Mendelsohn, Oliver. and Marika Vicziany, The Untouchables. Combridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Munshi, Shew Shunker Singh. and Pandit Sri Gunanand, History of Nepal. Delhi, India: Low Publications, 1877.

Naidu, Sushil K. Nepal Society and Culture. Delhi, India: Kalinga Publications, 1999.

Naik, Cregory S.J, Understanding our fellow pilgrims. Gujarat, India: Anand Press, 2000.

Perry, Cindy L. Nepali Around the World. Kathmandu, Nepal: Ekta Books, 1997.

______________. A Biographical History of the Church in Nepal Katmandu, Nepal: Nepal Church History Project, 1989.

Shah,A.B. Religion and Society in India. Bombay, New Delhi: Somaiya Publications Pvt.Ltd, 1981.

Sharma, Bal Krishna. The orginal of Caste System in Hinduism and its Relevance in the Present context. Kathmandu, Nepal: Samdan Publishers, 1999.

Smart,Ninian. The World’s Religions. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge, 1998.

Vaidya, T.R. and B.R. Bajracharya, Nepal People and Culture (New Delhi, India: Anmol Publications Pvt Ltd, 1996), 25.




[1] Chun Shim Lee, “A Proposed Mission Strategy of the Korean Church for Nepal (M.A. thesis, ACTS, Seoul), 24; quoted in Introducing Nepal, P. 12.
[2] Cindy Perry, A Biographical History of the Church in Nepal (Katmandu, Nepal: Nepal Church History Project, 1989), 1-4.
[3] Ibid., 4.
[4] Ibid., 11-12.
[5] G. w. Emery and M.W. Anderson, Things Touching the King, (London: Marshall, Morgan and Scott, 1952), 94-96; quoted in Cindy Perry, A Biographical History of the Church in Nepal (Katmandu, Nepal: Nepal Church History Project, 1989), 11.

[6]T.R. Vaidya and B.R. Bajracharya, Nepal People and Culture (New Delhi, India: Anmol Publications Pvt Ltd, 1996), 25.
[7]Mangal Man Maharjan, Comparative Study of Hinduism and Christianity in Nepal (Kathmandu, Nepal: Ekta Books, 2002), 11.
[8]Ibid., 41-53.
[9]Ibid.,155-157.
[10] Ibid., 47.
[11] Ninian Smart, The World’s Religions (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge, 1998), 73.
[12] Munshi Shew Shunker Singh and Pandit Sri Gunanand, History of Nepal (Delhi, India: Low Publications, 1877), 29.
[13] Cregory Naik, S.J, Understanding our fellow pilgrims (Gujarat, India: Anand Press, 2000), 185.
[14] Bal Krishna Sharma, The orginal of Caste System in Hinduism and its Relevance in the Present context (Kathmandu, Nepal: Samdan Publishers, 1999), 39.
[15]Ninian Smart, 87.
[16]A.B Shah, Religion and Society in India (Bombay, New Delhi: Somaiya Publications Pvt.Ltd, 1981), 66.
[17]Mark Johnson, The Quandary of Caste Voice of Bhakti: Text in Context, Number 4: November 2002.
[18]Caste and Ethnicity,” Google; available from http://countrystudies.us/nepal/; Internet; accessed 28 May 2004.
[19]Chun Shim Lee, 31.
[20]Ibid.,32.
[21]Oliver Mendelsohn and Marika Vicziany, The Untouchables (Combridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 6.
[22]Dor Bahadur Bista, People of Nepal (Bhotahity, Kathmandu: Ratna Pustak Bhandar, 1996), 1.
[23]Bal Krishna Sharma, 38.
[24] Ibid., 38-39.
[25] Sushil K. Naidu, Nepal Society and Culture (Delhi, India: Kalinga Publications, 1999), 143.
[26] Bal Krishna Sharma, 4.
[27] Dor Bahadur Bista, 1.
[28] Chun Shim Lee, 33.
[29] T.R. Vaidya and B.R. Bajracharya,18.

[30]“Religion and Society.” Google; available from http://countrystudies.us/nepal/33.htm; Internet; accessed 28 May 2004.

[31]Karl Samson, Jane Aukshunas, “Frommer's Nepal, 4th Edition.” Google; available from http://www.frommers.com/destinations/nepal/0232020416.html;Internet;accessed 28 May 2004.

[32]“Religion and Society.” Google; available from http://countrystudies.us/nepal/33.htm; internet; accessed date 28 May 2004.

[33]Ibid.
[34] Chun Shim Lee.,36.
[35] Cindy L. Perry, Nepali Around the World (Kathmandu, Nepal: Ekta Books, 1997), 5-6.
[36] Dor Bahadur Bista, 160-166.
[37] Chum Shim Lee, 40.
[38]Cindy Perry, 27.
[39]Ibid, 11.
[40]Mangal Man Maharjan, 11.
[41]International Christian Concern, “Persecution on Nepal,” Google; available from http://www.persecution.org/countries/Nepal.html; Internet; accessed May 31, 2004.
[42]Joshua Project, “people groups by country” Google; available from http://joshuaproject.net/countries.php?rog3=NP; Internet; accessed May 31, 2004.

[43]Mangal Man Maharjan, 153-159.
[44] Jonathan Lindell for the United Mission to Nepal, Nepal and the Gospel of God(Kathmandu, Nepal: The United Mission to Nepal and Pilgrims Book House, 1997), 31.
[45]Joshua Project, “list of Unreachedpeople in Nepal”, Google; avilabel from http://www.joshuaproject.net/countries.php?og3=NP; Internet; accessed date 29 May, 2004